Open contest
19 companies value 57 bn revenue 56 bn margin -29.3% free cash flow -15 bn avg. score 0.8
RIVN holds 31.5% of the group's value, 1.5x the runner-up
| Rank | Ticker | Company | Share | Value | Revenue | Margin | FCF | 5 years | FCF/px | Yield | What it does · why it is here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RIVN | Rivian Automotive United States · score 0.0 | 32% | 18 bn | 5.9 bn | -55.0% | -3.5 bn | -19.5% | — | Rivian electric pickups and vans · Electric pickups and vans; a long-term contract with Amazon | |
| 2 | LI | Li Auto China · score 1.6 | 21% | 12 bn | 16 bn | 1.0% | -1.8 bn | -15.2% | — | Extended-range electric vehicles, from China · EVs with an onboard generator, the best-selling format in China | |
| 3 | XPEV | XPeng China · score 3.7 | 16% | 8.8 bn | 11 bn | -1.5% | 0.8 bn | 8.7% | — | Smart electric vehicles, from China · Chinese EVs focused on in-house autonomous driving | |
| 4 | NIO | NIO Inc. China · score 0.0 | 15% | 8.4 bn | 13 bn | -17.1% | -0.4 bn | -5.2% | 0.1% | Electric vehicles with battery swapping, from China · Chinese premium EVs with battery swapping at its own stations | |
| 5 | VFS | VinFast Auto Ltd. Vietnam · score 0.0 | 12% | 6.8 bn | 3.6 bn | -110.2% | -2.7 bn | -39.6% | — | Electric cars from Vietnam · Vietnam — revenue of $3.6bn | |
| 6 | LCID | Lucid Group United States · score 0.0 | 2% | 1.2 bn | 1.6 bn | -249.2% | -5.1 bn | -419.2% | — | Lucid luxury electric cars · Luxury electric sedans with the longest range on the market; Saudi backing | |
| 7 | PSNY | Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Sweden · score 0.0 | 1% | 0.6 bn | 3.0 bn | -67.0% | -1.4 bn | -252.9% | — | High-performance electric cars · Sweden — revenue of $3bn | |
| 8 | LOT | Lotus Technology Inc. China · score 0.0 | 1% | 0.3 bn | 0.3 bn | -112.7% | -0.3 bn | -82.3% | — | Luxury electric cars under the Lotus brand · China — revenue of $268m | |
| 9 | LVWR | LiveWire Group, Inc. United States · score 0.0 | 1% | 0.3 bn | 0.0 bn | -234.5% | -0.1 bn | -16.0% | — | Electric motorcycles · Wisconsin — revenue of $31m | |
| 10 | NIU | Niu Technologies China · score 4.3 | 0% | 0.1 bn | 0.6 bn | -0.9% | 0.0 bn | 17.2% | — | Electric scooters and motorcycles, from China · China — revenue of $616m | |
| 11 | GGR | Gogoro Inc. Taiwan · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.1 bn | 0.3 bn | -28.4% | -0.0 bn | -48.3% | — | Electric scooters and battery swapping, from Taiwan · Taiwan — revenue of $281m | |
| 12 | SEV | Aptera Motors Corp United States · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.1 bn | — | — | -0.0 bn | -43.6% | — | Three-wheeled solar electric vehicle · California | |
| 13 | KNDI | Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. China · score 4.5 | 0% | 0.0 bn | 0.1 bn | -107.4% | 0.1 bn | 268.9% | — | Electric vehicles and golf carts, from China · China — revenue of $87m | |
| 14 | WKHS | Workhorse Group Inc. United States · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.0 bn | 0.0 bn | -289.0% | -0.1 bn | -189.1% | — | Medium-duty electric trucks and buses · Michigan — revenue of $27m | |
| 15 | LOBO | LOBO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. China · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.0 bn | 0.0 bn | -16.9% | 0.0 bn | -77.7% | — | Eco-friendly electric mobility and home robots · China — revenue of $23m | |
| 16 | EZGO | EZGO Technologies Ltd. China · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.0 bn | 0.0 bn | -55.0% | -0.0 bn | -292.0% | — | Electric bicycles and tricycles and charging stations, from China · China — revenue of $20m | |
| 17 | FLYE | Fly-E Group, Inc. United States · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.0 bn | 0.0 bn | -67.9% | -0.0 bn | -241.4% | — | Fly E-Bike branded electric motorcycles, bikes and scooters · New York — revenue of $16m | |
| 18 | FFAI | FARADAY FUTURE INTELLIGENT ELECTRIC INC. United States · score 0.0 | 0% | 0.0 bn | 0.0 bn | -218x | -0.1 bn | -30x | — | Electric vehicles (FX Super One) and embodied AI robots · New York — revenue of $2m | |
| 19 | CENN | Cenntro Inc. United States · score 0.7 | — | — | 0.0 bn | -423.9% | -0.0 bn | — | — | Electric and hydrogen commercial vehicles · New Jersey — revenue of $17m |
Other industries in the same sector
- Sector overview
- Online retail and marketplaces 36 companies
- Automakers 6 companies
- Restaurants 35 companies
- Home improvement retail 4 companies
- Online travel and booking 14 companies
- Apparel and off-price retail 23 companies
- Hotels and cruises 16 companies
- Consumer electronics 15 companies
- Cruise lines 5 companies
- Auto parts retail 7 companies
- Homebuilders 16 companies
- Athletic apparel and brands 12 companies
and 36 industries more
- Branded apparel and accessories 30 companies
- Used car retail 5 companies
- Luxury goods 2 companies
- Casinos and resorts 15 companies
- Private education 39 companies
- Resale and handmade marketplaces 7 companies
- Casual dining restaurants 13 companies
- Home and decor retail 9 companies
- Beauty retail 7 companies
- Auto dealerships 9 companies
- Online sports betting 10 companies
- Electronics retail 3 companies
- Home appliances 10 companies
- Online classifieds 10 companies
- Car rental 5 companies
- Home and pool distribution 4 companies
- Recreational vehicles and boating 16 companies
- Toys and board games 8 companies
- Gyms and fitness 6 companies
- Sporting goods retail 4 companies
- Outdoor gear and apparel 12 companies
- Pizza and fast delivery 4 companies
- Mattresses and bedding 3 companies
- Grocery delivery 2 companies
- Leisure and entertainment 11 companies
- Movie theaters 5 companies
- Flooring and surfaces 3 companies
- Manufactured housing 4 companies
- Department stores 2 companies
- Automotive services 6 companies
- Education and consumer services 9 companies
- Jewelry retail 5 companies
- Residential furniture 8 companies
- Specialty retail (diversified) 12 companies
- Theme parks 3 companies
- EV charging 10 companies
What this is. A catalogue, not a guide. Every industry with stocks listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ, the companies contending for its leadership, what each one does according to its own annual report, and the balance sheet it filed with the SEC.
The score runs from 0 to 10 and compares each company with every other one in the almanac on cash generation, profitability, debt, dividends and consistency over the last five years. The higher it is, the better the company fares in that comparison. Curious how much each part weighs? Ask at the bottom of the page.
The score runs from 0 to 10 and compares each company with every other one in the almanac on cash generation, profitability, debt, dividends and consistency over the last five years. The higher it is, the better the company fares in that comparison. Curious how much each part weighs? Ask at the bottom of the page.